Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru |
National Assembly for Wales
Y Pwyllgor Newid Hinsawdd, Amgylchedd a Materion
Gwledig | Climate Change, Environment and Rural Affairs
Committee
Ymchwiliad Bioamrywiaeth | Biodiversity Inquiry
BIO 17
Ymateb gan : Undeb Cenedlaethol yr Amaethwyr (NFU Cyrmu)
Evidence from : National Farmers’ Union Cymru (NFU
Cymru)
- NFU Cymru
welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Climate Change,
Environment & Rural Affairs Committee Inquiry into
Biodiversity.
- We note this
inquiry is intended to explore biodiversity restoration in the
context of the proposed Public Goods Scheme and asks:
-
- How could the
Welsh Government’s proposed Public Goods Scheme, set out in
Brexit and Our Land be applied to restore biodiversity;
- How could the
various existing Welsh Government policies and legislation for
biodiversity restoration be applied in the design and
implementation of the proposed Public Goods Scheme; and
- What lessons can
be learned from the Glastir Monitoring and Evaluation Programme
(GMEP) to ensure effective monitoring and evaluation of schemes to
support restoration of biodiversity. How should the new
Environment and Rural Affairs Monitoring and Modelling Programme
(ERAMMP) be designed and implemented effectively for this
purpose?
- Firstly, we note
in the background narrative provided to the Inquiry, the Committee
refers to Natural Resources Wales (NRW) State of Natural Resources
Report (SoNaRR) as well as the State of Nature Report produced by
environmental NGOs. We would take this opportunity to refer
you to the body of evidence presented in GMEP here which refers to a number of
positive trends emerging
from this Programme which is one of the most comprehensive
monitoring of agri-environment schemes anywhere in Europe.
These include:
-
Stable overall plant species richness in woodland habitat but
evidence of a decline in arable, improved and habitat land up until
2007 when it appears to have stabilised
-
Recent stability for upland farmland birds and an increase in
woodland bird species
-
No further decline over the last 10 years in specialist butterfly
species
-
General ongoing improvement in the condition of small streams since
1990 based on macro-invertebrate communities with 80% of streams
surveyed through GMEP in good or high ecological
condition
-
A significant trend for increasing area of woodland over the last
15 years.
-
An increase in woodland bird indicators
-
Land use, land use change and forestry in Wales has changed from a
small GHG source to a sink between 1990 and 2013 as a result
of increased carbon storage in vegetation and soils
-
Reductions in nitrogen fertilizer consumption across Wales by
approximate 45% between 1990 and 2013
-
A significant decline in available phosphorus for improved land
providing benefits for freshwaters
- The 30 year
record of topsoil carbon indicates no decline and there is ongoing
recovery of soil acidity – both are positive
outcomes.
- Overall the GMEP
Programme findings show an overall picture of stability and some
improvement.
- With respect to
how the proposed Public Goods Scheme as proposed in Brexit and Our
Land could be applied to restore biodiversity we would make the
following points. You are also referred to the NFU Cymru
response to the Brexit and Our Land consultation
available here.
- NFU Cymru key
principles for future policy include:
-
- A policy that
underpins and secures the continued support of safe, quality,
traceable, affordable food for our nation, in the context of future
global challenges, must be at the heart of any future agricultural
policy
- All farmers must
be fairly rewarded for the environmental/public goods they already
delivery and will continue to deliver in future for
society
- Policies must be
simple to administer, easy to understand and target support at
those active farmers who take the financial risks associated with
food production
- Investment
measures are required to ensure that farming businesses are well
equipped to face the challenges and maximise the opportunities of a
post-Brexit marketplace
- The regulatory
regime must be proportionate and evidence-based and policies must
be adequately funded to ensure that Welsh farming remains
competitive with farmers in the UK, EU and
globally
- In terms of a new
agricultural policy for Wales, NFU Cymru proposes a single,
integrated, flexible framework based around three cornerstones
– productivity, environment and
volatility/stability.
- Farmers manage
over 80% of the land area of Wales. Over many centuries
farming has shaped the countryside we all now enjoy. Over the
past 30-40 years, farmers have carried out a huge amount of work to
encourage wildlife, enhance the landscape, benefit soils and water
and reduce climate impacts.
- Every farmer in
Wales already contributes and has the potential to further
contribute to practical environmental farm management that includes
the protection and enhancement of existing features on their farm
as well as the maintenance of actively farmed land to support
biodiversity, carbon, soils, water and air quality alongside their
core food production role.
- In terms of
environment measures, NFU Cymru proposes a farmed environment
scheme that is open and accessible to every farmer that wishes to
undertake activities that go beyond the regulatory baseline.
This scheme should be multi-annual and the ambition should be to
have the maximum amount of farmed land under the scheme. The
scheme must be developed in genuine partnership with the farming
industry and be properly trialled and piloted ahead of
roll-out. Detailed assessment of impacts – economic,
environmental, social and cultural – are vital prior to any
changes being implemented.
- Complimentary to
the farmed environment scheme, NFU Cymru would support the
introduction of an advanced scheme for farmers who wish to go above
and beyond the measures in the farmed environment scheme.
This scheme would be suited to those farming is designated areas or
farmers with designated sites on their farm, those with significant
natural constraints and those who have been in agri-environment
schemes or farming organically for a significant number of
years.
- Future
environment support should include a mix of management and capital
payments.
- Given the
proportion of land in Wales that is tenanted, special consideration
will need to be given as to how tenant farmers can access support
in the future.
- In framing
payment for the delivery of public goods related to resilient
habitats and ecosystems, NFU Cymru would highlight the need to
consider and understand the concept ‘natural
environment’. No area of Wales is truly natural in the
sense that it has been unaltered by human activity. The vast
majority of what is described as the natural environment is in fact
semi-natural vegetation and semi-improved grassland which is
reliant on active and continuing land management by
farmers.
- The natural
environment should not be presented within the future Public Goods
scheme as something that requires ‘protection’ from
agricultural activity. Rather it should be viewed as being
conserved by the farming community who have created, shaped and
maintained the environment over centuries.
- There is a need
to recognise and value the maintenance of habitats within the
Public Goods scheme alongside habitat creation, restoration and
enhancement.
- Significant areas
of habitat already exist of Welsh farms. These habitats and
their connectivity through provision of well managed hedgerows and
streamside corridors and so on must be valued through the future
approach. The aim should be to maintain diversity of
habitats. This will include improved grasslands and diverse
cropping which are all highly important feeding areas for many bird
species.
- NFU Cymru
strongly rejects the proposal that future support should only
encompass the provision of additional public goods from the
land. Farmers alongside their role as food producers have and
continue to produce a vast range of goods and services for
society. It is important to recognise that many of our most
valued species and habitats are the result of active management by
farmers, for example, through grazing of livestock.
- NFU Cymru
believes the starting point for the development of any proposed
public goods scheme should begin with an assessment of the public
goods farmers are already delivering. We would highlight, in
the context of possible radical changes to the trading and policy
support environment, there can be no guarantee that these baseline
public goods will continue to be delivered in the future.
- More information
is urgently needed on the methodology by which public goods, values
and outcomes will be determined for public goods. We have
concerns that the sheer complexity in identifying outcomes, their
proxies and values may limit the inclusion of very important public
goods. The basis on which public goods are included in the
future public goods scheme may be subject to lobbying pressure and
not considered on an objective basis.
- We foresee that
the process by which outcomes for biodiversity and ecosystems will
be valued and monitored to be highly complex and difficult.
The outcomes for biodiversity and the capacity of farmers to
deliver results is likely to be influenced by a range of factors,
many of which will be completely outside their
control.
- For example,
consideration will be needed of pressures and drivers of
biodiversity change at the appropriate spatial scale. Many
species on the red list, for example, will be migratory species and
subject to pressures outside Wales. A further example of
factors beyond the farmers control would be predation which is a
significant issue that is contributing to the decline of some
species. There will be a need to recognise that effective
species management varies from strict protection through to
deployment of active control measures where species populations
start to increase to unsustainable levels, impacting negatively on
their habitat and other species.
- The timing of
inspection for outcomes that are seasonal or weather sensitive is
an additional area where farmers could be placed under
stress.
- NFU Cymru
believes that the pros and cons of an outcome based approach,
therefore, merits further detailed consideration. Whilst the
inflexible, prescriptive nature of the Glastir Scheme has proved
challenging for farmers, results based approaches have their own
advantages and disadvantages. Thus far, such approaches have
been for singular priority environmental outcomes as opposed to the
delivery of multiple public goods. Results based approaches
have, to date, also operated alongside Pillar 1 direct support.
Welsh Government, through proposals, is in very much uncharted
territory as a result and great care is needed to ensure that
impacts and unintended consequences are fully
understood.
- It is important
to recognise that results-based approaches increase the risk for
farmers and embed an inherent volatility in the key mechanism aimed
at delivering rural resilience.
- The provision of
some public goods is reliant on farming activity and the intrinsic
links between public goods and farming activity is an area which
requires further exploration. Fundamentally we believe a
fundamental principle for moving forward should be the development
of a public goods scheme that pays for the public goods and
benefits arising from agricultural activity.
- Whilst the
proposed Economic Resilience Scheme has not been made the subject
of this Inquiry specifically, we take this opportunity to highlight
that investments that improve productivity of farm holdings can
often deliver improvements in the environmental performance of the
business also.
- In terms of the
existing Welsh Government policies and legislation that should
underpin the development of the proposed Public Goods Scheme, we
would refer you the Well-Being of Future Generation Act (2015) as
well as the Environment (Wales) Act (2016).
- The Well-Being of
Future Generations Act establishes how all public bodies must work
to enhance economic, environmental, social and cultural well-being
of Wales. The proposed land management scheme must be
designed through this lens. Indeed, it our view that it is
only through achieving economic resilience that the continued
delivery of the range of goods and services provided by farmers
will continue to flow. The lack of coherence between
proposals in Brexit and Our Land and a wider suite of policy
drivers fundamental importance to well-being and the economy of
Wales is, therefore, concerning.
- We are clear that
economic resilience underpins environment, social and cultural
resilience. The delivery of biodiversity outcomes will be one
of many objectives that the future policy will need to
secure. We would further highlight that whilst this Inquiry
seeks to examine biodiversity and there will be international
commitments for Welsh Government in this area, it is also important
to note that there will be a range of international and national
obligations Wales has to meet and future policy should not be used
for the advancement of any one of these obligations over another.
- The requirement
for future agricultural policy to deliver against the Natural
Resources Policy is, therefore, concerning and out of line with the
wider legislative agenda.
- The Environment
(Wales) Act (2016) establishes the principles of the sustainable
management of natural resources and sets outs ways of
working. We would highlight that the framework established
under this Act is still new and not widely understood. The
process of developing area statements for example, is at its early
stages. There are risks that area statements could result in
a post code lottery of support for farm businesses across Wales
– areas where public goods delivery is prioritised and areas
where food production is prioritised. In our view a scheme that has
as its sole objective delivering the Natural Resources Policy
cannot be assumed to deliver equal access to all farm
businesses.
- We would be
concerned if future public goods approach specified areas, set
boundaries, placed restrictions on what public goods can be
delivered where. We would highlight that the spatial mapping
process underpinning Glastir Advanced has been a significant source
of frustration to many farmers who have been denied opportunities
to participate in the scheme. Ultimately, the delivery of
outcomes for the environment is dependent on farmers wanting to
participate in schemes.
- In terms of
lessons that can be learned from GMEP, NFU Cymru would highlight
that we have long expressed disappointment that the positive
outcomes resulting from the investment of public funds in existing
agri-environment schemes like Glastir (highlighted above) have been
very poorly communicated or promoted to the
public.
- In reality,
farmers who have participated in schemes which have been designed
by experts, which are challenging to comply with and which
contribute a very limited amount to farm profitability as payments
are based on a cost-incurred basis, frequently express frustration
that they continue to be criticised for their environmental
performance despite doing exactly what they have been told to
do. This is an important point as it undermines confidence in
participation in future schemes.
- On the issue of
moving beyond ‘cost incurred, income forgone’
calculations, we would highlight that Welsh Government have stated
as fact that the future scheme will not be paid on a cost incurred,
income forgone basis. Whilst this would be welcome, at this
stage NFU Cymru does not share the same confidence that this will
be achievable and 100% certainty is required before
progressing.
- We would
highlight that the stakeholder group established to guide the
operation of the GMEP programme has not been continued in the
ERRAMP programme and we believe that this is a significant
omission. A clearer communications plan by which findings can
be communicated is also required.
- Overall we would
highlight that farmers in Wales have a long track record of
delivering practical environmental action and management at farm
level to deliver positive outcomes for biodiversity. Before
moving forward, Welsh Government must seek to address the issues
and uncertainties set out in this response.
- NFU Cymru
believes that biodiversity obligations have to be balanced with a
range of other economic, broader environmental, social and cultural
objectives. We are clear that the focus of the future public
goods scheme should be on optimising multiple benefits through
sustainable agricultural systems.
- We note the
invitation to submit oral evidence to the Committee on Thursday
7th February 2019. NFU Cymru looks forward to
giving evidence at this event.